Thursday, April 11, 2013

Plain Dealer Heads into Part-time Home Delivery

(Also posted on Plunderbund)

Not since LeBron James packed up his wallet and left town has anything bestirred  the Plain Dealer's readers more than the paper's official announcement that it would implode to a three-day-a-week delivery system this summer.   The angry letters to the editor and telephone calls to the downtown  offices were not unexpected as rumors circulated for weeks that the PD would suffer the same fate as other papers owned by Advance Publications that were abbreviated. "The readers are really upset about it," says Harlan Spector,the guild president and 22-year veteran of the paper's news staff. "They feel betrayed."

Although Spector has had the nearest view of the paper's plans as the union's representative, he admits there's not much more that he knows beyond what the paper's front office has reported.  "There are a lot of unanswered questions."

The readers' responses in letters have run the gamut from  disbelief  ("crappy, shortsighted, narrow-minded fat-out wrong'' ) to the old chestnut that liberalism  was the  culprit for the paper's decline. (The "endless, slavish drumbeat for Democratic ideas might just be the problem".)

Sorry to disengage anybody from that stale curse.  The PD has long been in league with the city's powerful conservative establishment that heads out to the eastern suburbs each evening after office hours.  But there's far more to the story. Try, for example the  crushing  blow of the social media that is draining the life blood from what we once took for granted as newsprint journalism.

Investor-conscious Wall Street owners of the corporate media have also eagerly sought ways to eliminate unions from their bottom lines.  In Cleveland,  the paper has negotiated the removal of 60 full-time company drivers and re-hired some of them on a part-time basis - a not-uncommon sleight-of-jobs by other big employers to erase  health-care and other benefits.

Finally, there have been strategic decisions that turned out to be false gods.  The Beacon  Journal, for example, once tried a full-court circulation press on Canton, only  to absorb  a lot of red ink before it called off a failed venture.

In Syracuse, where Advance Publications, converted the Post-Standard to a three-day delivery cycle,  the outcome has been pathetic.  Columbia Journalism Review reported this week that  the paper  is printing  no more than 12,000 newsstand  copies on the non-delivery days - less than a sixth of its daily circulation on the former home-delivery days.  At that, the newsstand   buyers are getting no more than a 16-page skeleton.

The PD and BJ were once such rivals that one seldom saw the other's name in the  local print.  That, too, has changed as the papers across the state now ride piggyback with each other's stories ,complete with bylines and attribution . It was interesting,  then,  to see a series  of ads in the BJ now promising seven-day home delivery. Just one more sign of the desperation rattling the papers these days.

Ryan Chittum, the writer of the CJR report, was hardly impressed with the Plain Dealer's message to its readers  that the paper was "Adapting to better serve our community".

"Saying the changes are to "'better serve our community' is insulting  to readers and the 53  journalists the paper is about to fire," Chittum wrote.

Actually, it had been 58,but five have already pulled out on their own.

The PD's guild contract  doesn't expire until 2019,  but as one reporter sighed: "By then there will be nobody left anyway".

Defeat is in the air.  And that's not news anymore.






.









 r


1 comment:

David Hess said...

The Plain Dealer's death throes, like those in many other larger cities, were foretold a few decades ago when the newspaper industry began the march toward corporate conglomeration for the ostensible purpose of accumulating capital by going "public" in the stock market. Instead of local ownership, independent and often family-run, the resulting newspaper chains became targets for investors bent on maximizing profit margins at the expense of high-quality journalistic content. In effect, the privately owned papers lost control of their financial future and fell prey to the financial marketeers whose only aim was to milk them dry. Under the new regime, such conglomerates as Gannett and the late and unlamented Knight-Ridder also neglected to recognize and adopt earnings strategies for the advent of the Internet. Sadly, there appears to be no rescue in sight for the newsprint medium, nor a shield against the blow to democracy that this portends.